Examinando por Autor "Sakka, Amir"

Mostrando 1 - 2 de 2
  • Documento de conferencia
    Acceso Abierto
    Tool support for Generating User Acceptance Tests
    (2020) Camilleri, Guy; Antonelli, Leandro; Zarate, Pascale; Gardey, Juan Cruz; Martin, Jonathan; Sakka, Amir; Torres, Diego; Fernández, Alejandro
    Software testing, in particular acceptance testing, is a very important step in the development process of any application since it represents a way of matching the users’ expectations with the finished product´s capabilities. Typically considered as a cumbersome activity, many efforts have been made to alleviate the burden of writing tests by, for instance, trying to generate them automatically. However, testing still remains a largely neglected step. In this paper we propose taking advantage of existing requirement artifacts to semi-automatically generate acceptance tests. This paper extends a previous paper in which we use Scenarios, a requirement artifact used to describe business processes and requirements, and Task/Method models, a modelling approach taken from the Artificial Intelligence field. The proposed approach derives a Task/Method model from Scenario (through rules) and from the Task/Method model specification, all alternatives in the flow of execution are provided. Using the proposed ideas, we show how the semi-automated generation of acceptance tests can be implemented by describing an ongoing development of a proof of concept web application designed to support the full process.
  • Documento de conferencia
    Acceso Abierto
    UX Challenges in GDSS: An Experience Report
    (2019) Sakka, Amir; Bosetti, Gabriela Alejandra; Grigera, Julián; Camilleri, Guy; Fernández, Alejandro; Zaraté, Pascale; Bimonte, Sandro; Sautot, Lucile
    In this paper we present a user experience report on a Group Decision Support System. The used system is a Collaborative framework called GRoUp Support (GRUS). The experience consists in three user tests conducted in three different countries. While the locations are different, all three tests were run in the same conditions: same facilitator and tested process. In order to support the end-users. we teach the system in two different ways: a presentation of the system, and a video demonstrating how to use it. The main feedback of this experience is that the teaching step for using Collaborative tools in mandatory. The experience was conducted in the context of decision-making in the agriculture domain.