Development of an ionic-liquid-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method for the determination of antichagasic drugs in human breast milk. Optimization by central composite design

cic.isFulltexttruees
cic.isFulltexttruees
cic.isPeerReviewedtruees
cic.lugarDesarrolloLaboratorio de Investigación y Desarrollo de Métodos Analíticos es
cic.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionen
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-18T12:36:06Z
dc.date.available2018-05-18T12:36:06Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://digital.cic.gba.gob.ar/handle/11746/7802
dc.titleDevelopment of an ionic-liquid-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction method for the determination of antichagasic drugs in human breast milk. Optimization by central composite designen
dc.typeArtículoes
dcterms.abstractChagas disease constitutes a major public health problem in Latin America. Human breast milk is a biological sample of great importance for the analysis of therapeutic drugs, as unwanted exposure through breast milk could result in pharmacological effects in the nursing infant. Thus, the goal of breast milk drug analysis is to inquire to which extent a neonate may be exposed to a drug during lactation. In this work, we developed an analytical technique to quantify benznidazole and nifurtimox (the two antichagasic drugs currently available for the medical treatment) in human breast milk, with a simple sample pre-treatment followed by an ionic-liquid-based dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography and UV detection. For this technique, the ionic liquid 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate has been used as the “extraction solvent”. A central composite design was used to find the optimum values for the significant variables affecting the extraction process: volume of ionic liquid, volume of dispersant solvent, ionic strength, and pH. At the optimum working conditions, the average recoveries were 77.5 and 89.7%, the limits of detection were 0.06 and 0.09 μg mL-1 and the inter-day reproducibilities were 6.25 and 5.77% for benznidazole and nifurtimox, respectively. The proposed methodology can be considered sensitive, simple, robust, accurate, and green.en
dcterms.creator.authorPadró, Juan Manueles
dcterms.creator.authorPellegrino Vidal, Rocíoes
dcterms.creator.authorEchevarria, Romina Noeles
dcterms.creator.authorCalifano, Alicia N.es
dcterms.creator.authorReta, Mario Robertoes
dcterms.extent32 p.es
dcterms.identifier.otherdoi:10.1002/jssc.201401367es
dcterms.identifier.urlRecurso onlinees
dcterms.isPartOf.issuevol. 38, no. 9es
dcterms.isPartOf.seriesJournal of Separation Sciencees
dcterms.issued2015-02
dcterms.languageIngléses
dcterms.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (BY-NC-ND 4.0)*
dcterms.subjectantichagasic drugsen
dcterms.subjectcentral composite designen
dcterms.subjectdispersive liquid–liquid microextractionen
dcterms.subjectionic liquidsen
dcterms.subjectliquid chromatographyen
Archivos
Paquete original
Mostrando1 - 1 de 1
Imagen en miniatura
Nombre:
Development of an ionic-liquid-based dispersive liquid.pdf-PDFAU.pdf
Tamaño:
1.01 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Documento completo